Hedieh Mirahmadi

Iran is not simply teetering on the edge of unrest. It is standing at a historic rupture, one that carries consequences far beyond its borders. What unfolds next will reshape energy markets, redraw regional alliances, challenge Islamist power structures, and test the moral clarity of the West and the Church alike. This is not a local uprising. It is a global fault line.

At the heart of the question is whether the Islamic Republic can survive sustained internal collapse or whether it will be decisively dismantled through airstrikes, internal fracture, or a combination of both. A full destruction of the regime would send shockwaves across the Middle East, not least because Iran sits at the center of proxy warfare, nuclear brinkmanship, and global oil supply chains. Any destabilization of Tehran reverberates through Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Iraq and Syria, the Houthis in Yemen, and even energy prices felt by American families at the pump.

President Donald Trump has made clear in past conflicts that American involvement is rarely altruistic. His approach to Venezuela demonstrated that regime pressure often comes with long-term U.S. interests attached, particularly oil. Trump has openly said the United States would be involved there “for years” and Iran would be no different. Even if Washington were to assist in facilitating the return of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, it would come at a price. Power vacuums invite factions, and Iran has no shortage of them.

Inside the country, the chants are unmistakable. “Javeed Shah--Long live the King” has echoed through protests, signaling an overwhelming popular rejection of Islamic rule. Yet outside Iran, the opposition landscape is far messier. Competing factions backed by powerful Western and regional forces are positioning themselves for influence. Chief among them is the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, or MEK, whose very name means “those who fight jihad for truth.” Despite the branding, the reality is darker.

The MEK is a Marxist-Islamist cult that demands absolute obedience, suppresses dissent, and operates with rigid ideological control. It does not resonate with a generation of Iranians who are risking their lives for personal freedom, not ideological replacement. Yet the MEK has found defenders in surprising places within Western political circles, including figures such as Rudy Guiliani, John Bolton and Mike Pence. Their support reflects a dangerous misunderstanding of the Iranian people’s aspirations and a willingness to empower another authoritarian movement under the guise of opposition.

Power, Oil, and Global Consequences

The stakes extend well beyond Iran’s borders. A destabilized or liberated Iran would dramatically affect global energy markets, potentially lowering oil prices and weakening petro-authoritarian regimes. It would alter nuclear negotiations overnight. It would challenge the balance of power across the Middle East, especially among Islamist governments that have been propped up by Western policy for decades, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and now post-war Syria and Iraq. Many within the U.S. State Department fear “regional imbalance” if Iran falls. What they truly fear is something unprecedented: the defeat of Islamic rule by its own
people.

Regional leaders from Riyadh to Ankara do not want a free Iran. Saudi Arabia and Qatar worry about oil price shocks and the ideological implications of a successful anti-Islamist revolution. Turkish President Erdogan fears the precedent it would set for political Islam across the region. Trump will hear these concerns loudly. At the same time, he faces pressure from isolationist elements within his own base who reject any form of nation-building or prolonged U.S. involvement abroad.

Officially, the administration maintains that diplomacy comes first. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has stated that while negotiations are preferred, nothing is off the table. Trump has already imposed a sweeping 25 percent tariff on any entity doing business with Iran, signaling that economic warfare is very much underway.

Israel’s position adds another layer of complexity. A free Iran would almost certainly align against Islamist terror networks and in favor of Israel’s security. That shift would have profound implications for the Abraham Accords, Palestinian statehood debates, and regional peace negotiations. The very existence of a non-Islamist Iran would upend decades of anti-Israel strategy rooted in Tehran.

Yet military intervention is not the only tool available, and it is striking how many non-military options remain underutilized. The United States possesses some of the most advanced cyber capabilities in the world. Iranian internet infrastructure, traffic systems, and regime-controlled media could be disrupted at scale. The temporary shutdown of Iran’s national television network showed what is possible. More could be done.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, continues to operate with alarming freedom through front companies, shipping firms, construction conglomerates, charities, banks, and energy intermediaries. Assets are hidden through relatives. Money is laundered through third countries. Operatives travel under diplomatic cover. Sanctions are riddled with carve-outs and selectively enforced by Western governments terrified of escalation.

Cutting off the IRGC would require real resolve: aggressive enforcement of material support laws, freezing assets held by proxies and family members, blocking insurance and port access, grounding aviation services tied to IRGC networks, and ending humanitarian or commercial channels the Guard secretly controls. Elevating authentic opposition voices, smuggling communication tools and supplies into Iran, and conducting psychological operations that sow doubt within regime ranks are all viable strategies that fall short of open war.

The urgency of this moment is underscored by recent developments. The U.S. has ordered evacuations of American citizens. France has withdrawn diplomats. Intelligence reports suggest regime elites are already moving money and preparing exit strategies. The cracks are real.

Faith, the Church, and What Comes Next

For the Church, this moment carries profound spiritual weight. Iran is a theocracy that criminalizes Christianity. Converts are branded traitors. Pastors are imprisoned. Evangelism is treated as a national security threat. Yet despite relentless persecution, Christianity is growing through underground churches, exposing the moral and spiritual bankruptcy of political Islam.

While Iranians risk everything to escape Islamic rule, too many Western churches remain silent, confused, or morally neutral. Scripture does not permit such detachment. Isaiah commands, “Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Hebrews reminds us that what can be shaken will be shaken, so that what cannot be shaken may remain.

Living fearless does not mean predicting outcomes or endorsing geopolitical schemes. It means refusing to avert our eyes, refusing to distort the truth, and refusing to let fear dictate our witness. Millions of Iranian Christians are praying for freedom. The question is whether the global Church will have the courage to stand with them when history is being written in real time.

For biblical insight, cultural analysis, and fearless reporting on moments shaping our world, stay connected with the Real Life Network. Visit RealLifeNetwork.com to watch, listen, and stand for truth where faith and current events collide.

‍Living Fearless exists to bring clarity where there is confusion and truth where there is silence. I’m Hedieh Mirahmadi, and through this podcast on the Real Life Network, I speak with conviction about the spiritual, cultural, and ideological threats facing our nation today. This is a place where biblical truth is not softened, where hard realities are confronted honestly, and where courage replaces fear in a world increasingly hostile to Judeo-Christian values. Watch now for free and get grounded in truth at RealLifeNetwork.com.

I have lived inside the very world I am warning you about. For more than twenty-five years, I worked on the front lines of America’s fight against Islamic extremism across more than thirty-five countries. I advised governments, built counter radicalization programs, and worked alongside federal agencies including Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the FBI. This was not academic work. It was lived experience.

I was raised in a politically conservative Iranian American home and spent much of my adult life as a devout Muslim involved in reformist movements. I believed spiritual reinterpretation could defeat jihadist ideology. That belief gave me access to networks few outsiders ever see, but it also revealed a hard truth. You cannot defeat a spiritual war with policy alone.

It was only when I surrendered my life to Jesus Christ that I fully understood the nature of the battle. Islamism is not merely a religion. It is a political ideology cloaked in spiritual language, driven by conquest, and empowered when the church remains silent. That realization is what brings me here, to this network, and to Living Fearless.

Islam & Christendom in Perpetual War: Phase One

To understand the present, we must confront the past honestly. Christendom once covered the Middle East, North Africa, Greece, Rome, Spain, and much of Europe. These lands were Christian centuries before Islam emerged in the seventh century. The early spread of Islam was not peaceful evangelism. It was military conquest.

After the death of Muhammad, Islamic armies expanded rapidly through force. Christian communities were displaced, churches destroyed, women assaulted, and believers forced to convert, pay heavy taxes, or die. By 732 A.D., Islamic forces had reached deep into Europe before being stopped at the Battle of Tours in France.

For centuries, Christians under Islamic rule faced systemic oppression. This reality led directly to the Crusades, which were not random acts of aggression, but a response to generations of invasion and persecution. While mistakes were made, the historical context matters. Phase One of Islamic conquest was military, territorial, and violent.

That phase ended with the collapse of the Ottoman Caliphate after World War I. But the ideology did not die. It adapted.

Cultural Jihad & Modern Islamist Strategy: Phase Two

When armies failed, the strategy changed. Islamists shifted from swords to systems. This is Phase Two: cultural and civilizational jihad.

The Muslim Brotherhood became the intellectual backbone of modern Islamism, openly describing their mission as a civilizational struggle. Their strategy, known as tamkeen, focuses on planting deep roots within a society through schools, charities, media, mosques, colleges, and eventually government.

I witnessed this firsthand across Europe, the Middle East, and the United States. Cultural jihad operates slowly and intentionally. It reshapes identity before laws ever change. Violence comes later. The mindset comes first.

This ideology spread globally through Saudi funded education, Islamist organizations, and alliances with groups like Hamas, al Qaeda, and political movements across continents. Eventually, it reached the West, embedding itself in universities, nonprofits, courts, and activist networks under the language of civil rights and social justice.

The Rise of Cultural Jihad in the United States

In America, Islamists learned to exploit our freedoms. They work within the system, using our laws, our compassion, and our fear of offending others. Mosques, prisons, charities, student groups, and interfaith initiatives became strategic entry points.

Prisons, in particular, became major recruitment hubs. Student organizations echoed Brotherhood talking points. Lawsuits and public pressure forced institutions to accommodate ideological demands. This was not accidental. It was planned.

Communities in states like Minnesota, Illinois, and Texas reveal the same pattern: trust building first, identity shaping second, political influence last. Cultural jihad does not begin in Congress. It begins quietly, at the community level.

The Islamist Conquest of the U.S. & the Red Green Alliance

Today, Islamism has merged with radical leftism in what is known as the Red Green Alliance. Their end goals differ, but they share one objective: dismantling Judeo-Christian values.

This alliance is visible on college campuses, in city councils, and in Congress. Islamist aligned politicians normalize anti-Israel rhetoric, excuse corruption, and frame America as inherently oppressive. Criticism is silenced by accusations of Islamophobia.

Religious liberty is weaponized. Political ideology is disguised as faith. And institutions partner with these groups without understanding the long-term consequences.

Separate Islam from Muslims: A Call to Clarity, Courage, and Compassion

I want to end where the Gospel always leads us: truth paired with love.

Muslims are not our enemy. They are our mission field. I know this because I was one of them. Islamism thrives on fear and silence. Jesus came to break both.

We must oppose political Islam with courage, while loving Muslims with compassion and clarity. Only the Gospel transforms hearts. Only Christ sets captives free.

This is Living Fearless. And this is why I speak.

Watch Living Fearless on the Real Life Network and share it with someone who needs clarity right now. Download the RLN app and start watching for free at RealLifeNetwork.com. 

For more articles like this click here. 

A Regime Facing Rejection, Not Reform

Iran is entering a phase that its ruling clerics have long feared but refused to acknowledge. What began years ago as scattered unrest has now hardened into a sustained rejection of the Islamic Republic itself. Across multiple cities, protesters are no longer bargaining with power. They are repudiating it. The chants coming from the streets no longer ask for reform within the system. They call for the system’s removal.

According to reporting by Iranian dissident and analyst Anni Cyrus, one of the most alarming developments for the regime is the growing number of protesters openly calling for the return of Crown Prince Reza Shah Pahlavi. That demand is unprecedented in the context of Iran’s post-1979 political order. It signals not a longing for the past, but a rejection of clerical supremacy and the religious state that has dominated Iranian life for more than forty years. When crowds chant for a figure explicitly displaced by the Islamic Revolution, they are not negotiating terms. They are declaring the revolution itself a failure.

This shift matters because the Islamic Republic is not merely a government. It is an ideological system that fuses religious authority with political control and enforces obedience through fear. The regime’s legitimacy rests on the claim that it governs by divine mandate. Any public challenge to that claim, especially one voiced by large numbers of ordinary citizens, strikes at the heart of its authority. That is why the state’s response has been swift and violent.

Security forces have fired live ammunition into crowds. Arrests have escalated into the thousands. Executions have been carried out under vague criminal charges designed to disguise political repression as law enforcement. Internet blackouts and surveillance have intensified in an attempt to control the narrative and isolate protesters from one another. These measures reflect a regime that understands it is losing consent and is relying increasingly on brute force to maintain control.

Faith, Fear, and the Collapse of Legitimacy

Economic collapse has accelerated the unrest, but it did not create it. Inflation, unemployment, and shortages have devastated everyday life, yet these hardships are widely understood inside Iran as symptoms of a deeper problem. The ruling clerical class has enriched itself while ordinary Iranians struggle to survive. Corruption is systemic. Accountability is nonexistent. Faith has been weaponized to silence dissent rather than to serve the people.

Religious minorities, particularly Christians, have borne the cost of this system for decades. Iran remains one of the most hostile environments in the world for Christian converts. Leaving Islam is treated as a political offense. House churches are raided. Pastors are imprisoned. Evangelism is prosecuted as a threat to national security. These actions are not anomalies. They are the logical outcome of a state that cannot tolerate allegiance to any authority beyond its own religious framework.

Yet despite the repression, Christianity continues to grow underground in Iran. House churches persist. Converts continue to testify to encounters with Christ through Scripture, personal witness, and dreams. The expansion of the Christian faith under such conditions highlights the inherent weakness of coercive religious rule. When belief is enforced by law, it eventually collapses under its own contradictions. Faith that is freely chosen cannot be extinguished by prisons or executions.

Why Iran’s Uprising Matters to the World

Western policymakers have repeatedly misread this reality. For years, Iran has been treated as a conventional state actor capable of moderation through incentives and diplomacy. Nuclear agreements were framed as stabilizing tools. Sanctions relief was promoted as humanitarian. Dialogue was cast as the pathway to peace. These approaches failed because they misunderstood the ideological nature of the regime. The Islamic Republic is not oriented toward compromise. It is oriented toward survival through control.

The Iranian people appear to understand this more clearly than many Western institutions. Their chants are not aimed at foreign governments. They are aimed at the clerics who rule them. They are rejecting political Islam as a governing system, not merely objecting to economic conditions or foreign policy disputes. That distinction matters.

The contrast between Iran’s streets and Western discourse is stark. While Iranians risk their lives to escape Islamic rule, segments of Western culture continue to romanticize Islamist narratives under the banner of tolerance or social justice. While Iranian women defy compulsory veiling, Western institutions frame hijab enforcement as empowerment. While Iranian Christians worship in secret, Western churches often hesitate to speak clearly about the dangers of religious authoritarianism.

This moment demands honesty. The uprising in Iran is not simply another cycle of unrest. It is a reckoning with an ideology that promised justice and delivered repression. It is a warning about the consequences of merging religious absolutism with unchecked political power. It is also a reminder that truth, once awakened, is difficult to suppress.

Whether the current uprising succeeds or is violently crushed, the Islamic Republic has already lost something it may never recover. It has lost the belief of its people. Regimes can survive sanctions and protests. They rarely survive the collapse of legitimacy. Iran’s future remains uncertain, but one reality is now unmistakable. The era of unquestioned clerical rule is ending, and no amount of force can fully restore what has been broken.

For more by Hedieh Mirahmadi, watch Living Fearless on Real Life Network.

The violence we are witnessing across Western societies is no longer sporadic, accidental, or disconnected. It is ideological. Recent terror attacks and plots, spanning from Australia to Washington, D.C., from elite university campuses to major American cities, reveal a convergence of forces that are openly hostile to the moral framework that once anchored the West. The common thread is not nationality or circumstance, but a growing alliance between Islamist extremism and radical leftist movements, both committed to eroding Judeo-Christian civilization.

In Australia, the brutal attack on a Jewish gathering was a stark reminder that jihadist ideology does not recognize borders. Jewish families celebrating their faith were deliberately targeted, not because of geopolitical grievances, but because Islamist doctrine has long identified Jews as enemies to be eliminated. This was not random violence, nor was it a reaction to local conditions. It was the export of global jihad into a Western democracy that has repeatedly chosen denial over confrontation when it comes to Islamist ideology.

The same denial is evident in how Americans process violence at home. The shooting at Brown University has been framed primarily as another tragic campus incident, with authorities quick to assure the public that motive remains unclear. That may be procedurally accurate, but culturally evasive. American universities have become breeding grounds for ideological radicalization, where hostility toward faith, nationhood, and Western identity is normalized. Students are immersed in narratives that portray America as irredeemably evil, Christianity as oppressive, and violence as morally justified when cloaked in the language of resistance. When such ideas saturate the intellectual environment, violence should not surprise us.

The Convergence of Extremes and the Strategy of Chaos

The targeted attack on National Guard members in Washington, D.C. strips away any remaining illusion that this is merely a domestic social crisis. This was a calculated assault on representatives of the American state, carried out by someone shaped by radical Islamist beliefs. The symbolism is unmistakable. This was an attack on authority, order, and the legitimacy of the nation itself. It exposes the cost of importing unresolved ideological conflicts without demanding allegiance to American values or confronting radicalization within immigrant communities.

Perhaps the most revealing case is the terror plot disrupted in Los Angeles. Members of the Turtle Island Liberation Front were arrested while allegedly preparing coordinated bombings against civilian and law-enforcement targets. Their rhetoric blended revolutionary language, anti-colonial ideology, and militant pro-Palestinian messaging. This was not incoherent rage. It was a carefully assembled ideological framework that mirrors what we increasingly see on college campuses, in activist networks, and online spaces that glorify violence while condemning Western society as inherently illegitimate.

Federal analysts have begun describing this phenomenon as Nihilistic Violent Extremism, yet public discussion often strips the term of its most dangerous component. NVE is not limited to anarchists or radical leftists acting alone. It reflects a growing convergence between far-left revolutionary movements and jihadist ideology. While their ultimate visions differ, their immediate objectives align. Both seek to destabilize Western societies. Both reject Judeo-Christian moral authority. Both view chaos as a catalyst for transformation. Violence becomes not a tragedy, but a strategy.

This convergence explains why radical leftist groups increasingly excuse or rationalize Islamist violence, branding it resistance rather than terror. It also explains why jihadist movements find fertile ground within Western activist spaces that already despise national borders, religious tradition, and moral absolutes. Islamists bring ideological discipline and long-term ambition. Anarchists bring disruption, infrastructure sabotage, and a willingness to tear down institutions. Together, they form a volatile alliance capable of real harm.

The Los Angeles plot illustrates this dynamic with chilling clarity. The group’s members echoed Islamist talking points, adopted global revolutionary narratives, and aligned themselves with causes long exploited by jihadist movements to gain Western sympathy. This was not accidental overlap. It was ideological convergence. These movements may wear different masks, but they march toward the same goal: the dismantling of Western civilization’s moral and civic foundations.

A Spiritual Crisis That Demands Moral Clarity

What connects these acts of violence is not race, geography, or economic grievance. It is ideology. Each incident reflects a rejection of ordered liberty and an assault on the sanctity of life. Each is fueled by narratives that cast Judeo-Christian values as obstacles to liberation rather than the source of human dignity. Each thrives in a culture that refuses to define evil clearly and fears moral judgment more than moral collapse.

The refusal to confront Islamism honestly has accelerated this crisis. Political leaders, cultural institutions, and even some religious communities have chosen appeasement over truth. Radical leftist violence is excused so long as it adopts the language of justice. Islamist ideology is shielded behind claims of religious sensitivity. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens are told these threats are exaggerated, unrelated, or misunderstood.

History offers a sobering lesson. Civilizations rarely fall from external invasion alone. They unravel when moral clarity is abandoned and truth is replaced by grievance. When faith is displaced by ideology, violence follows. The recent wave of terror is not an anomaly. It is the predictable outcome of cultural and spiritual erosion.

This moment calls for discernment, not despair. The challenge before us is not merely political or security-based. It is spiritual. We are witnessing a revolt against the moral order that sustains freedom, justice, and peace. Countering it requires more than law enforcement or intelligence operations. It requires courage to name threats clearly, leadership willing to defend foundational values, and a renewed commitment to truth.

America’s strength has never rested solely on military power or economic dominance. It has rested on a moral framework rooted in Judeo-Christian principles. When those principles are undermined, the nation becomes vulnerable not only to enemies abroad, but to decay within.

The violence we are seeing is a warning. Whether we heed it will shape not only our national security, but our moral future. As Scripture reminds us, the struggle before us is not merely against flesh and blood, but against forces that seek to corrupt, divide, and destroy from the shadows. Recognizing that truth is the first step toward resisting it.

For more faith-filled content, watch Living Fearless Devotional on Real Life Network.